<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CreationAstronomy.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.creationastronomy.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.creationastronomy.com</link>
	<description>Exposing the evolutionary astronomy model, and defending the Biblical account of history</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>&#8220;Evolution Has Nothing To Do With Astronomy&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.creationastronomy.com/evolution-has-nothing-to-do-with-astronomy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.creationastronomy.com/evolution-has-nothing-to-do-with-astronomy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 19:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spike Psarris</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bad astronomy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[phil plait]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creationastronomy.com/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="images/book-covers/stellar-struct-140x140.jpg" width="140" height="140" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I a liar for applying the word &#8220;evolution&#8221; to astronomy?</p>
<p>Phil Plait, the &#8220;Bad Astronomer&#8221; who blogs for Discover magazine, <a rel="nofollow" href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/05/22/creationist-heh-astronomy-hahahahahahahahaha/" target="_blank">says so</a> in a recent post about my Solar System video.</p>
<p>Quoting Phil:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I watched the Jupiter video until all I could hear was a loud buzzing<br />
sound punctuated by the word &#8220;evolution&#8221;. Last I recall, evolution was<br />
the change in allele frequency over time&#8230; Jupiter has chromosomes?<br />
Are creationists that confused?</p>
<p>&#8220;Well, certainly many are, but why ascribe to ignorance what can be<br />
ascribed to misdirection? The creator of the video obviously uses the<br />
word evolution over and over again because it&#8217;s a buzzword likely to<br />
sway people predisposed against science to agree with the bizarre<br />
version of reality he espouses, even though he must know that evolution<br />
has nothing to do with astronomy.</p>
<p>&#8220;Hmmm. Bear false witness much?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Phil is calling me a false witness &#8212; a liar &#8212; for applying the word &#8220;evolution&#8221; to astronomy.</p>
<p>But as an astronomer, surely Phil knows that the word &#8220;evolution&#8221; is used <em>constantly</em> in astronomy &#8212; not to describe biological change, but to describe the naturalistic formation and development of celestial objects.</p>
<p>Surely Phil knows that countless astrophysics books present models for the &#8220;evolution&#8221; of stars:</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="10" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">
<div><img src="/images/book-covers/evo-stars.jpg" alt="" width="140" height="208" align="bottom" /></div>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<div><img src="/images/book-covers/phys-form-stars.jpg" alt="" width="140" height="209" align="bottom" /></div>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<div><img src="/images/book-covers/stellar-struct.jpg" alt="" width="140" align="bottom" /></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div><strong>Evolution of Stars</strong><br />
<strong>and Stellar Populations</strong></p>
<div style="font-size:small; font-style:italic">(by Maurizio Salaris<br />
and Santi Cassisi)</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div><strong>Physics, Formation<br />
and Evolution<br />
of Rotating Stars</strong></p>
<div style="font-size:small; font-style:italic">(by André Maeder)</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div><strong>Stellar Structure<br />
and Evolution</strong></p>
<div style="font-size:small; font-style:italic">(by Rudolf Kippenhahn<br />
and Alfred Weigert)</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>And galaxies:</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="10" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">
<div><img src="/images/book-covers/struct-evo-gal.jpg" alt="" width="140" height="208" align="bottom" /></div>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<div><img src="/images/book-covers/chem-evo-gal.jpg" alt="" width="140" height="209" align="bottom" /></div>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<div><img src="/images/book-covers/nucleo-chem-evo-gal.jpg" alt="" width="140" align="bottom" /></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div><strong>The Structure and<br />
Evolution of Galaxies</strong></p>
<div style="font-size:small; font-style:italic">(by Steven Phillipps)</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div><strong>The Chemical Evolution<br />
of the Galaxy</strong></p>
<div style="font-size:small; font-style:italic">(by F. Matteucci )</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div><strong>Nucleosynthesis and<br />
Chemical Evolution<br />
of Galaxies</strong></p>
<div style="font-size:small; font-style:italic">(by Bernard E. J. Pagel)</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>And planets:</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="10" cellpadding="5" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom">
<div><img src="/images/book-covers/planets-atmo.jpg" alt="" width="140" height="208" align="bottom" /></div>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<div><img src="/images/book-covers/compar-dyn-evo.jpg" alt="" width="140" height="209" align="bottom" /></div>
</td>
<td valign="bottom">
<div><img src="/images/book-covers/sol-sys-evo.jpg" alt="" width="140" align="bottom" /></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<div><strong>Planets and Their Atmos-<br />
pheres, Volume 33:<br />
Origins and Evolution</strong></p>
<div style="font-size:small; font-style:italic">(by John S. Lewis<br />
and Ronald G. Prinn)</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div><strong>A Comparison of the<br />
Dynamical Evolution of<br />
Planetary Systems</strong></p>
<div style="font-size:small; font-style:italic">(by R. Dvorak and<br />
S. Ferraz-Mello, Eds.)</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div><strong>Solar System Evolution:<br />
A New Perspective</strong></p>
<div style="font-size:small; font-style:italic">(by Stuart Ross Taylor)</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>In addition, Phil no doubt keeps up with the scientific literature that is full of this usage too. The June issue of the <em>Astronomical Journal</em> alone has 3 papers using &#8220;evolution&#8221; or &#8220;evolved&#8221; in their titles.</p>
<p>In the astronomical literature, the word &#8220;evolution&#8221; is <em>everywhere</em>.</p>
<p>So, why does Phil say &#8220;evolution has nothing to do with astronomy&#8221;?</p>
<p>Well, when your gun is out of bullets, you have to shoot blanks.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a debating tactic that&#8217;s as old as the ancient Greeks. When your opponent is correct and you can&#8217;t refute his arguments, you use an <em>ad hominem</em> attack instead.</p>
<p>You smear his character. Mock and ridicule him personally. Call him a liar, even when you know he&#8217;s correct. Anything to cover up the fact that he&#8217;s right.</p>
<p>In my video, I document the failure of the standard evolutionary model for our Solar System. Among other things, this model predicts that Jupiter can&#8217;t exist (but it does), Saturn can&#8217;t exist either (ditto), Uranus and Neptune shouldn&#8217;t have formed at all (but there they are), Mercury and Ganymede shouldn&#8217;t have magnetic fields (even though they do), Titan should have a global ocean of methane and ethane if it were really billions of years old (but it doesn&#8217;t)&#8230; the list goes on and on.</p>
<p>But Phil doesn&#8217;t address any of that. Instead, the person who once <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/movies/superman_returns_review.html" target="_blank">wrote</a> that &#8220;Stellar evolution [is] the process by which a star is born, lives out its life, and dies,&#8221; calls me a liar by insisting that &#8220;Evolution has nothing to do with astronomy&#8230; Bear false witness much?&#8221;</p>
<p>Reader, you can decide for yourself if there&#8217;s a false witness here &#8212; and if so, who it is.</p>
<div style="font-size:small; font-style:italic; text-align:right">Book cover graphics are from Amazon.com</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.creationastronomy.com/evolution-has-nothing-to-do-with-astronomy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What You Aren&#8217;t Being Told About Astronomy</title>
		<link>http://www.creationastronomy.com/hello-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.creationastronomy.com/hello-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Spike Psarris</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sonata.websitewelcome.com/~spcreati/?p=1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="images/140x140-spike-image.jpg" width="140" height="140" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" title="Spike Psarris" src="/images/140x140-spike-image.jpg" alt="" width="140" height="140" />We live in a Universe of breathtaking size and grandeur&#8211;but where did it come from?</p>
<p>Secular astronomers tell us it formed without a Creator about 14 billion years ago. The Bible tells us it was created by God only thousands of years ago. Which model does the evidence support? <span id="more-1"></span></p>
<p>The answer to this question might surprise you!</p>
<p>Recent discoveries have plunged the evolutionary model into a crisis. This site is dedicated to documenting this unfolding drama, and exposing the bankrupt evolutionist model for what it truly is.</p>
<p>The first subject is our Solar System&#8211;a magnificent example of God&#8217;s creative handiwork. To watch samples of a new video on this subject, click on the image to the right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.creationastronomy.com/hello-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
